Wow. Really folks. Really, take a long hard look at yourselves...
1. The modelling for the transition from the roundabout to the signals doesn't show significant delays for vehicles - this isn't a small win for a few people cycling at massive costs to motorists. This is a massive win for people who might cycle and are currently too scared to (that's most of London's population BTW), at a tiny cost to motorists (around half of Walthamstow and Leyton's households have no car).
2. The roundabout is clearly dangerous - just because East/West Ave are also dangerous, and other bits of Lea Bridge Road are too dangerous, doesn't mean the roundabout isn't. It's also utterly hostile to everyone - including drivers. Any driver who tells me they haven't had a terrifying near miss on there is, as far as I'm concerned, either a terrible driver or a liar.
3. Some cyclists run red lights and indeed a tiny tiny number knock over and kill people. Yes. It's true. Care to guess the proportion of rule-breaking cyclists compared to rule-breaking motorists though? It's about the same, funnily enough. Care now to guess the proportion of cyclists that severely injure or kill anyone else ever? Now care to guess the same for motorists? It's vastly different. So if you want to solve road danger, you can point a finger at the one cyclist who kills someone in the UK around every two years, or the hundreds, thousands, killed by motorists. Get some perspective, show some empathy, and stop trying to point the finger at others to avoid looking at your own behaviour and what we all, collectively most need.
4. No one pays "road tax" (you pay for emissions - as do cyclists, horse riders and electric vehicle owners) and the reason insurance isn't compulsory for cycling (similarly tests), is because the amount of damage cyclists do is so small that it isn't worth any government compelling people to do that stuff - any scheme would cost too much. Again, stop trying to make it all about "well cyclists do this" or "no cyclist gets any improvement to their lot until all of them behave" or even "no one cycles". It's a diversion tactic.
5. All the evidence is that the schemes in so far aren't gentrification (Blackhorse area, hello) and aren't causing congestion - that's just way too many people driving around our area and more and more people living here.
6. Finally, the council is making changes to our roads that very marginally inconvenience the minority of us that drive, for the benefit of the majority. The majority who say they'd cycle and walk more (and evidence shows do cycle and walk more) when they feel able to - when road conditions are safe enough. Enabling those folks to do more cycling and walking means fewer cars in front of you, less congestion, and less pollution. Crucially, with 1/3 of our primary kids leaving school obese, then more walking and cycling tackles inactivity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments welcome - but please be polite!