Government Cuts

Government Cuts

Golf Centre to become Camp Site

LETTER FROM LVRPA

Dear Laurie

Thank you for your letter. Before I deal with the points you have raised let me restate our commitment to the way forward we discussed when we met a month or so ago. Officers are currently looking at potential investment projects in the LBR/Marshes Area re: access and environmental improvement and we look forward to discussing with you and colleagues in the next couple of months.

I am concerned that you are taking such a stance towards a temporary campsite at the Waterworks and an important investment in a popular riding centre.

The campsite proposal for a short period this summer follows the highly successful 2012 campsite last summer. With the OP opening this summer there is an opportunity to provide our regional constituency with affordable visitor accommodation close to the OP. The Par 3 golf course is essentially a local amenity and the Authority needs to take a view as to how it deploys its resources in relation to who benefits.

Any proposal for permanent visitor accommodation at the WW will need to go through an extensive process of feasibility, business planning, design and of course a formal consultation process.

The Riding Centre is a highly popular facility and provides a unique venue for East London and for disabled riding in particular. The investment in 13 stables simply completes the potential for stables at the RC, is within the existing stables curtilage and has a marginal impact on the MOL. More than 50% of the total stables are for the community with the rest for commercial livery. You make the point that the papers emphasise the financial imperative and I would agree that there is perhaps too much emphasis here even though this is a major consideration. The community benefits are significant in terms of expanding the learn to ride programme, creating more jobs for young people and ensuring a viable future for this important community asset.

Of course there is a pressure to generate more income and in doing so with a ‘low impact’ investment so we can continue to provide an affordable community programme and continue to deliver a viable and successful regional and local sports venue.   

 If the Authority is to continue its good work in investing in the environmental infrastructure throughout the Lee Valley it needs to maximise income where it is possible to do so. Furthermore the Authority has a range of constituents and customer groups that it needs to serve and it is working hard to do so.

Finally in the context of the LBR/Marshes area the Authority is clear in its commitment to the effective reinstatement of the Leyton Marsh, investing £65k in local environmental improvements, achieving High Level Stewardship for Walthamstow Marshes from Natural England with the commitments that brings. Following our recent meeting where we discussed identifying specific projects for the LBR/Marshes area (referred to in first para above) I met with Cllr Coghill whose Walthamstow ward includes W Marsh. She is very keen to harness the positive energy of her constituents/users of the Marshes in relation to projects and initiatives. I shall be discussing with LV officers and WF colleagues how we put in place an effective ‘User’ group which can take on board all local interests and become a vehicle for further good work in the LBR/Marshes area.

I look forward to our further discussions in the next few months.

Best regards   

Shaun Dawson - Chief Executive

Direct: 01992 709 856

Lee Valley Regional Park Authority

Myddelton House, Bulls Cross, Enfield, Middlesex, EN2 9HG

Tel: 01992 717 711 Fax: 01992 719 937

Marsh Lane Bridge Approved

At last night's Planning Committee the Tories sided with Labour and approved the new bridge into Marsh Lane recreation area with the Liberal voting against. The committee decided to look at the plans from a narrow planning perspective and they could see no reason to refuse it. The Tories were complimentary about  the protesters saying "a number of people have invested their time in the welfare of this land" but still voted to build this unnecessary bridge.

It is still unclear why a bridge, that according to the officer's report "relatively minor proposal intended to improve access and provide an open and clear gateway into Leyton Jubilee Park" is needed. It is still unclear what the benefits will accrue from this new bridge and at leaset £250k will be spent on it.

Our fear is it is intended to open up the site for future development but what will that be - is Travelodge going to build another skycraper with wonderful views of the Lea Valley?

Marsh Lane Bridge Shortcomings

Dear Councillors
Apparently it is possible that you will not have been informed officially as Ward councillors that there is a proposal to demolish the existing bridges over Dagenham Brook at the bottom of Marsh Lane and plans to build a replacement, all at the cost of £250,000. The officers' report has wrongly identified the location as being in E11, and has not mentioned Lea Bridge Ward as an affected area. The works will involve areas in both Leyton and Lea Bridge Wards.
This proposal, by the Council department, is totally unnecessary and a terrible waste of Council tax-payers money. The report claims that there are aesthetic grounds for removing two perfectly serviceable and in the case of one of them, recently built, bridges.
The procedures for announcing and considering this proposal appear to be flawed, particularly around the lack of consultation with individuals, households and institutions who use these bridges.
Even worse, the underlying purpose for these works, as mentioned in the supporting papers, is to enable 'heavier vehicles' to enter what the Council has now renamed 'Leyton Jubilee Park'. There should be no need for heavier vehicles to enter Marsh Lane Fields from Marsh Lane, as the access from Orient Way already provides that facility. If approved, the building works would effectively provide a through-route for heavy vehicles coming off Church Road via Marsh Lane down to Orient Way. This should be avoided at all costs and has previously been rejected as a strategy.
I am sure that you are keen to avoid wasting Council tax-payers' money. I am confident that you would not want to see our Fields being subjected to heavier vehicles having access. I call on you to ensure that Marsh Lane Fields bridges are not demolished and replaced.
I have objected formally to the proposals, but am unable to attend the re-scheduled Planning Committee meeting tomorrow (26th March). However I know that there will be others who will speak against this atrocious, unnecessary and wasteful messing around with the borough's perfectly adequate assets.
I request that you check your records and that if you have not received proper due notice of these proposals as Ward Councillors you take the appropriate steps to ensure your duties and responsibilities are in order.
Many, many people are opposed to these ludicrous proposals. In view of the Council's tight budgetary situation there can be no justification for demolishing two bridges that have nothing wrong with them at a cost of a quarter of a million pounds, and in the bargain removing the dedicated access for Lammas School pupils.
Regards,
Claire Weiss
E10 7AR

God's Own Junk Yard

The tatty sign maker company at the bottom of Valentin Road, E17 is now making news! You either get excited about a junk yard or a proposed 5 storey block of flats. Is this better than the current metal wall which is a real eyesore!

God's own Junk Yard

Planning Application 

Hackney Marsh Petiton

Dear all,

A petition has just been created against the plans by Hackney Council to use Hackney Marshes for three major events over four months every summer.

Please sign and share the following petition here: 
https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/hackney-council-stop-the-plans-to-host-major-events-on-hackney-marshes-every-summer#

Help protect our marshes for people, for nature - forever!
Save Lea Marshes

Hackney Marsh Petition

Uproar at Plans

Wild Food Walk in Victoria Park

I thought your members might all be interested to know that I am running a couple of small wild food walks in Victoria and Springfield parks this summer .These are with the permission of the parks event management and focus on showing people some of the fascinating plants that exist all around us, not to encourage anyone to start picking and eating lots of things in thier local park. Would it be possible to let your members know? 

Please take a look at my website link below.

Many thanks john
> 
> http://www.foragelondon.co.uk/
> https://www.facebook.com/ForageLondon?ref=tn_tnmn



John's walks are in Springfield and Victoria Park not Walthamstow Marsh and he says he has permission. However, the walks cost £25 per head. 

Members might be interested to know that Transition Finsbury Park are running free wildlfe and foraging walks every second Sunday of the month

The next is Sunday, April 14, 2pm – 3pm

Meet at the Castle Climbing Centre, Green Lanes, N4 2HA

Each walk will have a slightly different focus and possibly a different walk leader, but we will always meet outside the
Castle and head along the New River Walk. Sometimes we will be using the London Wildlife Trust Centre and sometimes we will move more briskly and head into Finsbury Park. If you need the contact details of the person leading the walk or for any other information, please call Jo Homan on 07733 330 379.

Please note that the path is not accessible to wheelchairs and that it's tricky to take a bike through the gates. Please wear suitable footwear, in case of mud.

Meet near the front doors to the Castle Climbing Centre. (There is a lovely cafe in the Castle, in case you need refreshments before you the walk - but allow time to sign in.)

The following link takes you to the full programme:

http://www.transitionfinsburypark.org.uk/PACTcalendar

--- In saveleytonmarsh@yahoogroups.co.uk, Jonathan Brind <j@...> wrote:
>
> If refer you to LVRPA byelaw 
> 
> 4. Protection of structures and plants
> (1) No person shall without reasonable excuse remove from or displace within the ground:
> (a) any barrier, post, seat or implement, or any part of a structure or ornament provided for use in the laying out or maintenance of the ground; or
> (b) any stone, soil or turf or the whole or any part of any plant, shrub or tree.
> 
> 

Sylvia Pankhurst Film

Hello everyone, our first meeting for 2013 will be a showing of a wonderful documentary film on the inspiring life of Sylvia Pankhurst.

The film showing will be introduced by one of the film makers.

This feature length documentary chronicles Sylvia Pankhurst’s life as suffragette and revolutionary socialist. She was imprisoned more than any other suffragette for her tireless campaigning and unlike her mother Emmeline and sister Christabel, who dropped the fight for votes for women to support the 1914 war effort, Sylvia refused to sacrifice the fight for universal suffrage until it was won. Her opposition to the war and her internationalism were and remain exemplary and her bravery in fighting for equality and opposing all misanthropic trends puts her, as one interviewee put it, ‘up there with the angels.’

Entrance fee will be a donation to help pay for room hire, the DVD and publicity.

Please let me know if possible if are attending so I'll get some idea of numbers, and if I need to move to different room. I've attached a flyer, please circulate.

Thanks

Roger

http://rogerhuddle.blogspot.co.uk/

Mobile: 07973 443030